🔗 Share this article

Per a recent review, numerous of people having histories in the petroleum field have been placed within the present administration, featuring above 40 who formerly served straight for oil corporations.

Background of the Analysis

The report analyzed the histories of nominees and appointees working in the executive branch and eight federal departments overseeing climate policy. Those cover important organizations such as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Interior Department, and the Energy Department.

Wider Policy Environment

This analysis comes while ongoing initiatives to dismantle energy policies and clean energy incentives. For instance, new legislation have released vast sections of federal property for extraction and phased out funding for renewable energy.

Amid the firehose of negative actions that have occurred on the climate front... it’s important to remind the citizens that these are not just actions from the amorphous, huge thing that is the leadership broadly, stated a researcher participating in the report. They are commonly specific actors with ties to particular powerful groups that are implementing this damaging deregulatory agenda.

Significant Discoveries

Researchers found 111 staff whom they considered as fossil fuel insiders and clean energy critics. That covers 43 individuals who were personally working by gas companies. Included in them are well-known top officials like the energy secretary, who earlier served as top executive of a oil extraction company.

This list also features lesser-known government members. For instance, the department handling renewable energy is managed by a previous gas manager. In the same vein, a senior energy advisor in the White House has held senior jobs at major oil companies.

Other Links

Another 12 officials have connections to energy-financed conservative thinktanks. These encompass ex- employees and researchers of groups that have actively fought renewable energy and advocated the continuation of traditional energy.

A total of 29 further appointees are ex- business managers from polluting sectors whose activities are intimately tied to oil and gas. Further individuals have connections with power firms that distribute traditional energy or public representatives who have supported pro-gas agendas.

Agency Emphasis

Analysts identified that 32 staff at the Department of the Interior individually have connections to polluting energy, making it the highest compromised federal body. That includes the leader of the department, who has long accepted energy funding and acted as a conduit between energy sector supporters and the campaign.

Campaign Finance

Energy contributors provided substantial resources to the presidential initiative and inauguration. Since taking office, the administration has not only enacted energy-sector rules but also designed benefits and exceptions that benefit the field.

Expertise Questions

Alongside energy-connected appointees, the authors identified a number of administration higher-ups who were nominated to powerful positions with minimal or no relevant expertise.

Those officials may not be connected to fossil fuels so directly, but their unfamiliarity is concerning, stated a analyst. It is plausible to think they will be easily influenced, or easy marks, for the energy sector’s plans.

For example, the appointee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency’s division of general counsel has minimal litigation background, having not ever handled a case to resolution, not participated in a deposition, and never presented a court petition.

During a separate case, a administration assistant dealing on energy matters moved to the role after serving in positions separate to the sector, with no obvious relevant sector or regulatory background.

White House Reaction

One official for the executive branch rejected the report, stating that the administration’s appointees are exceptionally capable to implement on the public’s instruction to increase national resource output.

Historical and Present Context

This leadership implemented a significant array of anti-environmental measures during its previous term. During its second tenure, equipped with rightwing agendas, it has initiated a considerably wider and more aggressive rollback on climate regulations and alternative sources.

There is no shame, said one expert. The administration is proud and willing to go out there and tout the fact that they are performing benefits for the energy industry, mining field, the mining industry.